Joshua Goldman
Joshua Goldman
min read · July 17, 2025 · Entertainment

Blake Lively's Legal Blitz: Is Hollywood's 'Sweetheart' Turning Sour?

Blake Lively 's decision to subpoena more than a dozen indie journalists and small creators has ignited a free speech firestorm; seen in April 2025

Blake Lively's Legal Warpath Sparks Outrage and Backlash

In a stunning display of celebrity overreach, Blake Lively has sent shockwaves through the online community by issuing subpoenas to over a dozen journalists and small creators, demanding personal information, financial records, and IP addresses. The move has sparked widespread outrage, with many calling it a "bully" tactic that screams "toxic diva."

According to crisis PR expert Eric Schiffer, CEO of Reputation Management Consultants, Lively's decision is a nuclear overkill that will leave lasting damage to both her brand and public image. "Dragging micro-creators into court over chit-chat is not brilliance, it's bullying," he said.

Crisis PR expert Eric Schiffer (seen in 2014) has weighed in on how her latest legal move could leave lasting damage to both her brand and her public image

Schiffer warned that the move could turn America's sweetheart into Big Brother Blake, marked by an air of aggression and an attempt to silence critics. "This subpoena spree risks turning 'America's sweetheart' into a mutant privacy predator, muting her rom-com glow with legal napalm," he added.

The subpoenas, which target creators with modest followings, including requests for personal information and financial records, have triggered a backlash online and sparked concerns about celebrity overreach. Some of the contacted YouTubers include influential personalities with hundreds of thousands of subscribers, while others have less than 300 followers and say they can't afford an attorney to fight the demand.

A War on Free Speech?

'Dragging micro-creators into court over chit-chat is nuclear overkill that screams bully, not brilliance,' says Schiffer, CEO of Reputation Management Consultants (Baldoni seen last year)

The subpoenas are part of Lively's lawsuit against co-star Justin Baldoni, which has sparked a heated debate about free speech and online criticism. While the legal maneuver may be rooted in concerns about misinformation or reputation protection, Schiffer warns that it could backfire by triggering a viral David-vs.-Goliath narrative.

"Every subpoenaed small blogger becomes an epic-scale martyr; their followers swarm like digital hornets," he said. "You don't sue low subscriber fleas with flamethrowers—unless you crave a David-vs-Goliath backlash or you are absolutely sure you have the goods."

A Chilling Effect on Independent Creators

If Lively hopes to regain control of the narrative, Schiffer says she needs to act fast and avoid appearing defensive or evasive

Florida-based Lauren Neidigh, who has a small YouTube channel with around 20,000 subscribers, received one of the subpoenas and is now fighting back. "When you start going after people speaking their mind on their own platforms, you scare people out of doing that," she said.

Neidigh believes the subpoena will have a chilling effect on independent creators covering the case. "It's punching down on an individual level," she added.

The Great Subpoena Sweep

''Baldoni didn't need a counter-campaign with this tactic; Blake's attorneys handed him the slingshot,' he says. 'Blake's protective-order win rings hollow when she's busy rifling through strangers' Gmail,' Schiffer argued; Baldoni seen in 2024

The notices of the subpoenas were delivered via email to the YouTubers, addressed from Lively's attorney Esra Hudson at Manatt Phelps & Phillips. But one creator, Andy Signore, said he was initially told by Manatt's firm that the requests were not real.

"This is so damn shady," he ranted on YouTube. "I am furious at Blake Lively and her law firm about the Google subpoena."

Signore believes Lively has a further motive to get information from him, citing his documentary series "It Ends With Justice," which features anonymous sources from the set of It Ends With Us.

Last week, Lively caused an uproar on social media after sending a subpoena to Google asking for information about the accounts of pro-Justin Baldoni YouTubers

A Star-Studded Cast of Characters

The saga involves a star-studded cast of characters, including Candace Owens, Andy Signore, Perez Hilton, and Katie Joy. The drama has unfolded on social media, with many creators weighing in on the controversy.

Zack Peter, a popular YouTuber who covers Lively's case extensively, slammed her for issuing the subpoena. "I think Blake is trying to scare creators and get them to stop talking about her," he said.

Andy Signore, host of Popcorned Planet, believes Lively has more nefarious intentions with this newest move, claiming that Lively is alleged using the subpoena to unmask crew members who spoke to him anonymously in his upcoming documentary

But despite the backlash, some creators have rallied behind Lively, citing her right to protect her reputation and livelihood.

The Scholars Note: The Final Verdict

As the drama continues to unfold, one thing is clear: Blake Lively's legal warpath has sparked a firestorm of controversy that will not soon be extinguished. Will this move ultimately backfire and damage her reputation? Only time will tell. For now, it seems that celebrity overreach has reached new heights, and the world is watching with bated breath.

The notices were sent out to the YouTubers via their Google accounts and demanded 16 content creators to produce their private information - which initially led many to believe that it was a phishing scam

Read More:

  • The Scholars Note: The Lively Saga: A Star-Studded Cast of Characters
  • The Scholars Note: The War on Free Speech: Lively's Subpoenas Spark Outrage

DailyMail.com has reached out to Lively and Baldoni's reps for comment; seen in 2024

Baldoni has vehemently denied Lively's allegations against him; seen in 2024

On Thursday, Lively will deposed in Manhattan (seen in April 2025)